Law Offices of

Bernard C. Dietz, PC

Blog Home About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions
Internet Contracts
Trademarks & Copyrights
Strategic Partnerships
Domain Names
Website Sales & Purchases
Legal Compliance & Audits
Internet Law Blog

Information
Do you have internet or web legal questions or problems?  We offer a free consultation to discuss how we may be able to help you.

Simply call us at 804-290-7990 or send us an  with your question or issue.  We'll respond promptly and let you know how we can help.

  • Other Blogs I Like

  •  
    Friday, July 11th, 2008
    Posted by Bernie Dietz
    Categories: Legal Protection

    The FTC recently updated the CAN-SPAM Act (stands for Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003) to clarify certain requirements that affect commercial emailers.  If you send commercial email, and especially if you have affiliates that potentially send commercial email, you will want to stay up to date on the requirements of CAN-SPAM.   The FTC clarified 4 basic topics: 

    The first involves the "unsubscribe process" that has always been a part of the CAN-SPAM requirements (you must provide a valid and functioning unsubscribe method).  The new FTC rule now clearly states that you cannot charge a fee for the right to opt out (seems obvious), you can’t require someone to provide personally identifiable information as part of the unsubscribe process,  or to have to take multiple steps beyond sending a simple unsubscribe reply email or visiting one web page. 

    The second issue involves the common situation where a commercial email is really coming "from" more than one party.  The clarification allows the designation of a single party as the "sender" for purposes of CAN-SPAM.  The single party must meet certain requirements, however (must meet the definition of sender under the Act, for example) and it is important to note that if the designated sender does not comply with the other requirements of the Act, the other parties involved in the email can still be held responsible for those violations. 

    The third issue simply clarifies that the requirement of a valid physical address in the body of the commercial email may include an accurately registered P.O. Box or private mail box (doesn’t necessarily have to be a street address).  Obviously, the address must still be valid.

    The fourth issue simply clarified that when the Act mentions "person" it also means corporations, LLC’s, and other valid legal entities (no hiding behind your corporate veil).

    These updates and clarifications are very useful to legitimate emailers because it removes some of the doubt that existed previously.  Be sure to review your email practices from time to time to be sure you are in compliance with all of the requirements of CAN-SPAM.

    Comments are closed.



    Feeds

    Recently Posted

  • Categories

  • Monthly Archives

         

    Law Offices of      Bernard C. Dietz, PC

    An experienced Internet law firm that cares about your web business!

    Send us an or call us today
    804.935.8579

     
     
     
    Copyright 2006 Bernard C. Dietz, PC. All rights reserved

    DISCLOSURE: The information obtained in this website is for general information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Each legal issue is different and the information contained on this website may not apply to your case. No attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this website or by sending email to The Law Offices of Bernard C. Dietz, PC.